Competing for your Budget Dollars
Going by recent events, ATI has had a busy month with new mainstream and value segment GPUs launching at a steady pace. We have all seen the debut of the
Radeon HD 4670
earlier this month, with the 4650 following that shortly. The next step then is to go down the performance ladder and today, its budget Radeon HD 4500 series is about to be unveiled. Unlike NVIDIA's myriad model names, the Radeon HD 4500 series is positioned to be slower than the Radeon HD 4600 GPUs and is hence even less of a gaming graphics card. It's also priced accordingly, with ATI pegging it at between US$45 - 55, as compared to the US$79 Radeon HD 4670.
With ATI officially extending its Radeon 4000 series architecture to the budget segment with these upcoming cards, we decided that it was the right time to look at NVIDIA's equivalent, the GeForce 9400 GT, which was released about a month ago. At US$59, it would go directly against the newcomer and we should see some interesting comparisons between the two graphics rivals, besides the typical high-end shootout.
To aid us in this venture, we have gathered a reference ATI Radeon HD 4550 512MB DDR3 card from the chipmaker, while we had on hand a Zotac GeForce 9400 GT ZONE Edition, equipped with a passive heatsink and 512MB of GDDR2. Both GPUs are at their reference clock speeds, so they should be appropriate representatives of these new SKUs.
Adding more excitement and uncertainty into this duel, we threw in some of the closer competitors in this very tightly contested segment, where the price difference could be as small as US$10. It is nevertheless a crucial market segment, since manufacturers typically sell more of these budget/mainstream GPUs than the high-end models. By no means is the list of GPUs below exhaustive, but we have tried to remove some of the older and hence less relevant models.
The Budget Competitors
| Model |
ATI
Radeon HD 4550 512MB |
NVIDIA
GeForce 9400 GT 512MB |
NVIDIA
GeForce 9500 GT 512MB |
NVIDIA GeForce 8600
GT
256MB |
ATI
Radeon HD 3650 512MB |
| Core
Code |
RV710 |
G96 |
G96 |
G84 |
RV635 |
| Transistor
Count |
242
million |
314
million |
314
million |
289 million |
378
million |
| Manufacturing
Process |
0.055 |
0.055 |
0.065 |
0.08 |
0.055 |
| Core
Clock |
600MHz |
550MHz |
550MHz |
540MHz |
700MHz |
| Stream
Processors |
80
Stream processing units |
16
Stream processors |
32
Stream processors |
32
Stream processors |
120
Stream processing units |
| Stream
Processor Clock |
600MHz |
1400MHz |
1400MHz |
1190MHz |
700MHz |
| Texture
Mapping Units (TMU) or Texture Filtering (TF)
units |
8 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
8 |
| Raster
Operator units (ROP) |
4 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
| Memory
Clock |
1600MHz DDR3 |
800MHz
GDDR2 |
1600MHz
GDDR3
|
1400MHz GDDR3 |
1600MHz
GDDR3 |
| DDR
Memory Bus |
64-bit |
128-bit |
128-bit |
128-bit |
128-bit |
| Memory
Bandwidth |
12.8GB/s |
12.8GB/s |
25.6GB/s
|
22.4GB/s |
25.6GB/s |
| PCI
Express Interface |
PCIe
ver 2.0 x16 |
PCIe
ver 2.0 x16 |
PCIe
ver 2.0 x16 |
x16 |
PCIe
ver 2.0 x16 |
| Molex
Power Connectors |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Multi
GPU Technology |
Yes
(CrossFireX) |
No |
Yes
(SLI) |
Yes
(SLI) |
Yes
(CrossFire) |
| HDCP
Output Support |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Vendor dependent |
Yes |
| Street
Price |
US$45
- 55 |
US$59 |
US$70
- 90
|
US$70
- 80 |
US$55
- 90 |