When One Becomes Two
Just like day turning into night, it was all too predictable that NVIDIA has prepared a response to ATI's recent attempt to streamline its product lineup into a leaner and more price competitive bunch. A new ATI flagship, the single-GPU Radeon X1950 XTX, and additions to the mid and lower end graphics segment with the new Radeon X1650 PRO and X1300 XT are just
some of the recent announcements.
Of course, many of these measures are simply cosmetic or minor tweaks to clock speeds and product names while retaining the same core. More changes are expected as ATI continues to fine-tune its products and improve its fortunes, which frankly, has not been too rosy in the discrete segment.
Since the enthusiasts have gotten wind of the ATI revamp months before it actually happened late last month, you can bet that NVIDIA knows all about it. With its GeForce 7950 GX2 still mostly on top of the new Radeon X1950 XTX due to its two graphics cores in SLI, NVIDIA probably does not need reinforcements in that elite category. Even the new mid-range Radeon X1650 PRO may find the DDR3 versions of the GeForce 7300 GT a serious competitor. Hence, NVIDIA has chosen to preempt the upcoming changes expected from ATI. Details are still fuzzy about the developments over at ATI (we are hearing rumors of a possible Radeon X1900 PRO and Radeon X1650 XT) but we do know something about NVIDIA's plans and so far they seem to be focused on the high-end.
The crux of this plan seems to be the 'diversification' of the current GeForce 7900 GT, which is just doing what graphics chipmakers do best - recycling and cannibalizing their older products. Springing forth from the loins of the GeForce 7900 GT will be the GeForce 7950 GT and the GeForce 7900 GS. If you have been paying attention to NVIDIA's naming conventions, you would also know that the GeForce 7900 GS is the lesser of the two 'new' cards.
Apparently, the GeForce 7950 GT will be an enhanced version of the original GeForce 7900 GT, with higher clock speeds and a larger frame buffer of 512MB. Meanwhile, the card that we will be concentrating on today, the GeForce 7900 GS will naturally be a slightly 'crippled' version of the GeForce 7900 GT, with one less vertex processor and only 20 instead of 24 pixel processors (one less operating quad). In fact, the GeForce 7900 GS is actually not that new, since OEMs like
Dell has already been selling a version of it
for a while now with their systems. However, that version came with slightly different clock speeds from the eventual retail edition that's just been released. So how does this new retail edition GeForce 7900 GS stack up against the competition?
GPUs Comparison
| Model
|
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
256MB |
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
256MB |
NVIDIA
GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
|
ATI
Radeon X1900 GT 256MB |
ATI
Radeon X1800 GTO 256MB |
| Core
Code |
G71 |
G71 |
G73 |
R580 |
R520 |
| Transistor
Count |
278 million |
278 million |
177
million |
384 million |
321 million |
| Manufacturing
Process (microns) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
| Core
Clock |
450MHz |
450MHz |
560
MHz |
575MHz |
500MHz |
| Vertex
Shaders |
7 |
8 |
5 |
8 |
8 |
| Rendering
(Pixel) Pipelines |
20 |
24 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
| Pixel Shader Processors |
20 |
24 |
12 |
36 |
12 |
| Texture
Mapping Units (TMU) |
20 |
24 |
8 |
12 |
12 |
| Raster
Operator units (ROP) |
16 |
16 |
16 |
12 |
12 |
| Memory
Clock |
1320MHz DDR3 |
1320MHz DDR3 |
1400MHz
DDR3 |
1200MHz DDR3 |
1000MHz
DDR3 |
| DDR
Memory Bus |
256-bit |
256-bit |
128-bit |
256-bit |
256-bit |
| Memory
Bandwidth |
42.2GB/s |
42.2GB/s |
22.4GB/s |
38.4GB/s |
32.0GB/s |
|
Ring Bus Memory Controller |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
512-bit
(for memory reads only) |
512-bit
(for memory reads only) |
|
PCI Express Interface |
x16 |
x16 |
x16 |
x16 |
x16 |
| Molex Power Connectors |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Street Price |
US$199 (Launch Price) |
US$269 - 289 |
US$150 - 180
|
US$249+
|
US$199+
|
| Other
Information |
|
|
|
|
|